Categories
Law

Put the in-text quote in each.

My order:
1- No theft, no match please.
2-You can find the instructions inside the document
3- Please write a paper in the document
4- Write a report on whatever you use to research and what you write in a different document because we will discuss it separately in class
Write at least4 references using the APA style.
NB:
Please use simple language
Put the in-text quote in each.
Additions within the document.
Include your discussion question in the form below, as well as the answer to the question and the answer source.
In our study of contract terminology, we learn about valid, void, and voidable contracts. Discuss the differences.

Categories
Law

Learning goal: i’m working on a law writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a law writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Please use the slides, “unilateral care model”, “bilateral care model”, and “further variables” to help answer “Problem set 1”. All the information is in the slides to answer the questions in the first PDF.
Please ignore problem 1 “(1) Consider some of our historical case studies.” You do not need to answer this one.
Answer all the questions after this. I expect 5-7 sentences per question, maybe more or less than 5-7 sentences depending the question. Once again please use the slides to help answer the questions in the PDF “Problem Set 1”.

Categories
Law

Learning goal: i’m working on a law practice test / quiz and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a law practice test / quiz and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Categories
Law

Your original response to each essay question is to be between 500-700 words – excluding direct quotes.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a law question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Your original response to each essay question is to be between 500-700 words – excluding direct quotes. You are to provide at least 3 references other than your textbook and assigned articles to support each response. These references are to be in APA format. Corresponding citations should be included in your response to document/support the facts you provide.

Categories
Law

Corresponding citations should be included in your response to document/support the facts you provide.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a law discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Your original response to each essay question is to be between 500-700 words – excluding direct quotes. You are to provide at least 3 references other than your textbook and assigned articles to support each response. These references are to be in APA format. Corresponding citations should be included in your response to document/support the facts you provide.

Categories
Law

For example, if the question is whether the tort of fraud exists, next to this heading would be: “is there fraud?”

Learning Goal: I’m working on a law discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
With this topic, I want to challenge you to begin the methodical analysis of a legal problem.
In the very first week of law school all students are introduced to the IRAC acronym as the framework for analyzing legal problems. This approach becomes so embedded in an attorney’s way of thinking and is so useful in breaking down very complex legal problems with many separate legal issues into smaller, manageable parts, that it remains with most, if not all attorneys throughout their careers. Here it is:
Using these IRAC headings the legal problem is analyzed as follows:
I: (Issue)
This is the identification of the legal issue being analyzed. For example, if the question is whether the tort of fraud exists, next to this heading would be: “Is there fraud?”
R: (Rule of Law)
Next to this heading, the applicable rule of law is stated , setting out the required elements. If the issue is fraud, I would state: Fraud requires (1) a misrepresentation; (2) of a material fact; (3) made with knowledge of the falsity; (4) intention to deceive; (5) actual and reasonable reliance on the misrepresentation by the victim; (6) and resulting injury.
A: (Analysis of the law and facts)
Under this heading I analyze the facts to make sure each element of the tort stated under “R” exists in the situation being analyzed. If any element of the tort is missing, a claim to recover for that tort fails.
C: (Conclusion)
Here the conclusion of your analysis is stated. In our example, there is or is not the tort of fraud.
Most legal problems involve several separate IRAC analysis of each legal issue. For example, there may be a separate analysis of whether there was reasonable reliance, or a defense (like consent in a battery case).
This approach has the advantages of forcing analysis of each element, avoiding jumping to a conclusion without proper analysis, and breaking down the problem into small, manageable parts.
Using your new approach do and post a brief IRAC analysis of the following:
Bob went to a car dealership to buy a new car. He gave the used car manager his keys to the car he planned to trade in to buy the new car so that the manager could place a value on the trade. Negotiations continued for hours. Tiring of the process, Bob said that he wanted his keys returned so he could leave and go home. Instead of giving the keys to Bob so he could leave, the car salesman smiled and threw the keys on top of the building housing the car dealership. The salesman said: “It will take about 2 hours to retrieve your keys, so lets discuss buying the new car while we wait.”
Bob, in frustration, agreed to buy the new car, paying a bit more than he wanted.
Using the IRAC analysis approach very briefly answer this: Does Bob have claim of the tort of False Imprisonment against the car salesman.?
Here is “I:” Does False Imprisonment exist.
Here is “R” (the elements of false imprisonment): False Imprisonment is (1) intentional (2) confinement of a person (3) without legal privilege (4) for an appreciable length of time.
You need only complete the IRAC analysis by doing the A and C sections of the analysis.
A: You do the analysis, evaluating whether each element exists.
C: You state your conclusion based on your analysis.

Categories
Law

You just graduated and have been hired to consult with a company that wants to know all about what you learned about the event you chose.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a law discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
I DONT HAVE THE TEXTBOOK SO PLEASE READ BEFORE YOU BID!!!!!!!!!!!!
Based on the Read items thus far, pick any disaster or major event (non-terror related) you wish that you can examine and Monday morning quarterback it based on risk as we have discussed and learned. You just graduated and have been hired to consult with a company that wants to know all about what you learned about the event you chose. How can they learn from other’s mistakes? What could have and should have been done differently? This will require you to look at the known facts and compare them to the process of risk analysis in an after-the-fact examination.

Categories
Law

Answer the following questions for the discussion bored.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a law question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
1. Is this a contract?
2. Provide an analysis based on your
knowledge of contract formation (which should address all aspects of
contract formation and any possible defenses).
Answer the following questions for the discussion bored.

Categories
Law

-format of paper:

-In a three-page paper, students are to compare and contrast the pros and cons of the adversarial system of criminal trials in the United States and the inquisitorial system of criminal trials in a country of your choice. Examples of countries that use the inquisitorial system include France, the Netherlands, Germany and Italy, among others.
-This paper is due WEDNESDAY
-Format of Paper:
Paragraphs 1-2 should introduce the topic, the purpose of the paper and the countries of comparison.
Paragraphs 3-6 should describe the differences between the inquisitorial and adversarial systems of criminal trials including their origin, how they operate, and the strengths and weaknesses of each. In paragraphs 7-8, reflect on whether you believe the adversarial system as practiced in the United States is fair and balanced and whether it should be changed. Be sure to base your argument on a factual source of information. Include a references page of works cited and use APA citation style. Turn in a hard copy. Deposit in eportfolio.
This is a research paper where you need to do research and put it in a paper format, JUST FOLLOW THE FORMAT OUTLINE ABOVE AND YOU WILL DO FINE. The entire paper needs to be cited APA style, in-text citations (look up the purdueowl.com and our school’s library cite as well as our upload on Blackboard for APA tutorials and help).
-Citation sources:
-Purdue OWl link:
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/a…
-LaGCC Library APA citation link:
https://library.laguardia.edu/help/cite/apa/

Categories
Law

Texas v. johnson, 491 u.s. 397, was a landmark decision of the supreme court of the united states in which the court held, 5–4, that burning the american flag was protected speech under the first amendment to the constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech

Learning Goal: I’m working on a law case study and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Case Brief on Texas v. Johnson 1989 case
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the American flag was protected speech under the First Amendment to the Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech